Slow Home

In response to a comment on my Slow Home post I am answering here.

How does one afford it?

That is the problem isn’t it? A simple appeal to the consumer will yield little result. The current structure of development prevents affordable alternatives to the status quo. Consumers can’t wait for big developers to change and big developers have no motivation to change. A young family needing a house will purchase the house, out of those available, that best fits their needs. However, just because a consumer buys the best product they can doesn’t mean that it’s the best product for them or the one they really want. If all the cars you can afford are Fords and Chevys and you buy a Ford it doesn’t mean that Ford makes the best car for you. We need a Honda or Toyota in house production.

Look at Daybreak where just a few of the principles of New Urbanism are used – small lots, walkable tree lined streets, detached garages placed back from the street – and you see higher property values and extraordinary demand. All of these things would have been negatives to developers just ten years ago. People buying houses ten years ago might have been happy with a Daybreak style neighborhood but developers were telling them they wanted something different and no one was offering real alternatives. Daybreak is a weak example of what is possible. But zoning codes are still stuck in the 60’s, developers are notoriously conservative and contractors are frightened of change. If it worked in the past why change?

Worse yet if you want a modern house using unique materials in a walkable dynamic neighborhood you run into contractors that are scared to vary from long established routines without charging extra and developers who don't think people want modern homes (they also have no idea how to do them right).

To answer the question of how does one afford something like the Slow Home ethic is a complicated endeavor. Right now I am still figuring it all out. One thing however is sure - it involves a lot more than just the consumer.

I hope to revisit this topic again soon.

Mark Luthringer - Ridgmont Typologies

This says it! I won't say much - just that I am really glad to see this work. I really wish I had time to go to the show. Here is the site - read the statement.

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism

I just ran across this site. It has a nice set of articles under the "Architecture of the Month" section. I adore that set of buildings in the middle picture. I just wish I could see them larger. I don't imagine that I would like an entire street with such extreme step backs but this little section disrupts the wall nicely - like a river cascading down between two cliff faces.

Streets Matter

This site shows some great streets and some bad ones. Some are very functional others not. Some are beautiful and others not. Streets connect us both as communities and as individuals. Their design and dimensions matter.